Conejos County Sheriff's Office

Citation

CCDC v. Conejos County Sheriff's Office, 2012cv17

Issues

CCDC sent a CORA request to the Sheriff on January 24, 2012, requesting any records the Sheriff has regarding providing sign language interpreters to inmates or arrestees who are deaf.  We then sent a Notice regarding the request.  

Status

At a hearing on May 16, 2012 the Sheriff provided responsive documents.  Judge Martinez ordered Plaintiffs to file a fee petition within 30 days of the hearing and if the parties could not agree, Defendant was to respond to the petition within 30 days.  The Sheriff did not file a response.  Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment.  Just before the response date, the Conejos County Attorney entered an appearance and responded to both Plaintiffs motions for fees and costs and default judgment.  

On November 6, 2012, Plaintiffs moved for Summary Judgment. This document, the response, and reply are available below. On February 2, 2013, the Court denied Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, and the parties have a status conference on March 11, 2013. 

The Court held a hearing on May 17, 2013 in Alamosa District Court.

On September 24, 2013, the Court issued an order determining that all of the records CCDC sought were subject to the CCJRA and not CORA. The Court further held that the fact that the Sheriff's Office failed to respond to CCDC at all between when the request was recieved and the show cause hearing, constituted a denial of records. However, because the Sheriff testified that he had been actively looking for records during this time, the Court determined that the denial was not arbitary and capricous, and therefore CCDC was not entitled to its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. 

CCDC filed its Notice of Appeal on November 14, 2013.

On April 11, 2014, CCDC filed its opening brief with the Colorado Court of Appeals. CCDC argues that the District erred in determining that the records CCDC requested related the Sheriff's Offices obligations under Title II of the ADA were subject to the CCJRA and not to CORA. CCDC also argues that the District Court erred in determing that the Sheriff's conduct in failing to respond to CCDC for nearly months was not arbitrary and capricious. All Briefing has been completed. These documents are available on this website. We await the court's decision.


**If you are seeing this page as a result of using the search bar and the documents do not appear below, please follow this link and scroll down to the bottom of the page to find all documents.** 



Available Documents

2012.01.24 Conejos CORA Request
2012.04.25 Application to Show Cause
2012.06.15 Fee Petition
2012.07.20 Motion for Default Judgment
2012.08.07 Motion for Default Judgment
2012.09.10 Df's Response Motion for Default Judgment
2012.09.10 Df's Response to Motion for Fees
2012.09.18 Reply re Motion for Fees
2012.09.18 Second Supplemental Motion for Fees and Costs
2012.09.27 Pl's Supplemental Authority
2012.10.16 Order re Fees and Default
2012.11.06 Motion for Summary Judgment
2012.12.14 Response to Motion for Summary Judgment
2012.12.28 Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment
2013.02.21 Order Denying Summary Judgment
2013.04.22 Stipulation of Facts
2013.05.17 Hearing Transcript
2014.04.11 Amended Opening Brief
2014.05.16 Defendant-Appellee's Answer Brief
2014.06.06 Plaintiff-Appellant's Reply Brief
2014.11.26 Order Affirming District Court Opinion

Media Coverage

About Us | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement | Contact Us
© Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition
Pro Brono Web Design Grant provided by TechScouts